PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.33%
Gross profit growth of 8.33% while FURY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal improvements could expand further.
-63.34%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-32.04%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-41.36%
Negative net income growth while FURY stands at 7.18%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-48.81%
Negative EPS growth while FURY is at 13.10%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-37.50%
Negative diluted EPS growth while FURY is at 13.10%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-5.66%
Share reduction while FURY is at 6.72%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
2.14%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x FURY's 6.72%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-93.50%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-45.89%
Negative FCF growth while FURY is at 72.75%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.57%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while FURY is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
-331.24%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
4.45%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of FURY's 30.97%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
-342.39%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-550.48%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-66.03%
Negative 3Y CAGR while FURY is 35.27%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
136.00%
Below 50% of FURY's 331.68%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
2137.12%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x FURY's 59.25%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
-19.25%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while FURY is at 53.65%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-63.24%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
20.72%
Positive asset growth while FURY is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
8.82%
Positive BV/share change while FURY is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
54.31%
Debt shrinking faster vs. FURY's 110.89%. David Dodd sees a safer balance sheet if it doesn't impair future growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8621.88%
SG&A growth well above FURY's 18.81%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.