PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5586.54%
Positive gross profit growth while FURY is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
46.96%
EBIT growth 50-75% of FURY's 67.62%. Martin Whitman would suspect suboptimal resource allocation.
52.67%
Operating income growth at 75-90% of FURY's 67.69%. Bill Ackman would demand a plan to enhance operating leverage.
47.48%
Net income growth under 50% of FURY's 96.03%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
-300.00%
Negative EPS growth while FURY is at 95.92%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-312.37%
Negative diluted EPS growth while FURY is at 95.92%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
3.68%
Share count expansion well above FURY's 6.12%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.67%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x FURY's 6.10%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-487.38%
Negative OCF growth while FURY is at 45.63%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-0.13%
Negative FCF growth while FURY is at 46.12%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-218.49%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
-157.57%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while FURY is at 38.20%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
24.72%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of FURY's 57.46%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
-58.73%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while FURY is at 97.17%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
32.07%
Below 50% of FURY's 95.25%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
78.73%
3Y net income/share CAGR 75-90% of FURY's 93.81%. Bill Ackman might push for an operational plan to match or beat the competitor’s short-term growth.
91.72%
Below 50% of FURY's 586.01%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
-58.36%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while FURY is at 44.89%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
2.21%
Below 50% of FURY's 89.71%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
10850.00%
Our AR growth while FURY is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.83%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-5.78%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
1.18%
We have some new debt while FURY reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
175.99%
We expand SG&A while FURY cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.