10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.60M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
15.92%
Revenue growth of 15.92% while FURY is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a small edge can widen further.
16.66%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x FURY's 3.31%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
24.32%
Positive EBIT growth while FURY is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
70.99%
Positive operating income growth while FURY is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
-3.08%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.95%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
-3.08%
Share reduction while FURY is at 9.39%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
1.15%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x FURY's 3.95%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
573.30%
Positive OCF growth while FURY is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
341.16%
Positive FCF growth while FURY is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1387.63%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while FURY is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
424.22%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x FURY's 76.88%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
2558.81%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while FURY is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
748.61%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x FURY's 16.16% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
246.44%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x FURY's 69.96%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
506.34%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x FURY's 9.64%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
461.51%
Below 50% of FURY's 931.48%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
22.94%
Below 50% of FURY's 74.81%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
96.23%
Below 50% of FURY's 205.95%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1524.69%
AR growth well above FURY's 6.07%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
8.52%
Inventory growth of 8.52% while FURY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
5.47%
Positive asset growth while FURY is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
11.98%
Positive BV/share change while FURY is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-4.61%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.50%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.