PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
4.40%
Revenue growth of 4.40% while FURY is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a small edge can widen further.
3.99%
Gross profit growth 1.25-1.5x FURY's 3.13%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strategic sourcing or brand premium explains outperformance.
-335.97%
Negative EBIT growth while FURY is at 26.13%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-37.40%
Negative operating income growth while FURY is at 14.44%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-1188.31%
Negative net income growth while FURY stands at 30.72%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-1224.26%
Negative EPS growth while FURY is at 30.85%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-1287.50%
Negative diluted EPS growth while FURY is at 30.85%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.22%
Share reduction more than 1.5x FURY's 9.45%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
-5.12%
Reduced diluted shares while FURY is at 0.02%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-12.45%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-19.23%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1396.49%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x FURY's 31.82%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
175.98%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x FURY's 47.38%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
756.08%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while FURY is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
-18.94%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while FURY is at 14.93%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-95.03%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while FURY is 17.78%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-456.88%
Negative 3Y CAGR while FURY is 34.15%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
1373.63%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x FURY's 396.19%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
74.79%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of FURY's 89.56%. Bill Ackman might push for an improved ROE or share repurchase strategy to keep up.
81.70%
Positive short-term equity growth while FURY is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-92.97%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
2.55%
Inventory growth of 2.55% while FURY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
-17.28%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-12.49%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
-34.48%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
20.80%
SG&A declining or stable vs. FURY's 248.77%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.