PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
17.43%
Revenue growth of 17.43% while FURY is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a small edge can widen further.
19.06%
Gross profit growth under 50% of FURY's 100.00%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
-0.76%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
51.47%
Positive operating income growth while FURY is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
-12.86%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-13.50%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-13.31%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.72%
Share reduction more than 1.5x FURY's 3.38%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
0.48%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x FURY's 3.38%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.62%
Positive OCF growth while FURY is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
9.04%
Positive FCF growth while FURY is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8402402.28%
5Y CAGR of 8402402.28% while FURY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small improvements can scale into a larger advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1862.77%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x FURY's 13.35%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
665.23%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x FURY's 58.38%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
1450.91%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x FURY's 53.00%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
2319.35%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x FURY's 2.18% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
325.48%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x FURY's 51.79%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
265.03%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x FURY's 53.81%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
1766.33%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x FURY's 626.49%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
133.97%
5Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x FURY's 91.58%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms if reinvested profits or buybacks explain the superior buildup.
89.89%
Positive short-term equity growth while FURY is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
17.87%
AR growth well above FURY's 33.71%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
0.60%
Inventory growth of 0.60% while FURY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
4.15%
Positive asset growth while FURY is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
4.71%
Positive BV/share change while FURY is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-24.69%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.36%
We expand SG&A while FURY cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.