PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-6.59%
Negative revenue growth while FURY stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-7.58%
Negative gross profit growth while FURY is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
1.48%
Positive EBIT growth while FURY is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
-35.23%
Negative operating income growth while FURY is at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
23.38%
Positive net income growth while FURY is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
24.09%
Positive EPS growth while FURY is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
23.58%
Positive diluted EPS growth while FURY is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.43%
Share change of 0.43% while FURY is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
-3.86%
Reduced diluted shares while FURY is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-14.99%
Negative OCF growth while FURY is at 53.23%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-11.64%
Negative FCF growth while FURY is at 53.71%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1645.54%
3Y CAGR of 1645.54% while FURY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate to a more decisive lead.
2483.86%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x FURY's 73.96%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
820.83%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x FURY's 40.16%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
301.84%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x FURY's 57.10%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
7066.69%
Positive 10Y CAGR while FURY is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
378.04%
Positive 5Y CAGR while FURY is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
500.20%
Positive short-term CAGR while FURY is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
2935.48%
Positive growth while FURY is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
134.69%
5Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x FURY's 94.92%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms if reinvested profits or buybacks explain the superior buildup.
111.82%
Positive short-term equity growth while FURY is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.55%
Our AR growth while FURY is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
1.33%
Inventory growth of 1.33% while FURY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
-3.29%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
5.10%
Positive BV/share change while FURY is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-96.43%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
47.63%
SG&A growth well above FURY's 50.33%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.