PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
51.64%
Revenue growth of 51.64% while FURY is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a small edge can widen further.
20.77%
Gross profit growth of 20.77% while FURY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal improvements could expand further.
-180.56%
Negative EBIT growth while FURY is at 96.99%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
72.34%
Positive operating income growth while FURY is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
-367.69%
Negative net income growth while FURY stands at 96.99%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-368.62%
Negative EPS growth while FURY is at 96.97%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-381.69%
Negative diluted EPS growth while FURY is at 96.97%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.22%
Slight or no buybacks while FURY is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
0.22%
Diluted share count expanding well above FURY's 0.28%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
818.43%
OCF growth of 818.43% while FURY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can expand into a larger competitive lead.
-1121.77%
Negative FCF growth while FURY is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
195.30%
3Y CAGR of 195.30% while FURY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate to a more decisive lead.
14434.01%
OCF/share CAGR of 14434.01% while FURY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
3412.29%
OCF/share CAGR of 3412.29% while FURY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest momentum can translate into a bigger competitive lead.
1571.00%
3Y OCF/share CAGR of 1571.00% while FURY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see if small gains can expand into a broader advantage.
-47476.14%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while FURY is at 6.79%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-297.95%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while FURY is 26.13%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-409.43%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
1023.12%
Equity/share CAGR of 1023.12% while FURY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
137.82%
Equity/share CAGR of 137.82% while FURY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor advantage that could compound if the firm maintains positive net worth growth.
80.89%
Equity/share CAGR of 80.89% while FURY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if minor gains can snowball into a bigger lead soon.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
79.13%
AR growth of 79.13% while FURY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if the firm’s additional AR is warranted by strong revenue or potential risk.
120.96%
Inventory growth of 120.96% while FURY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
203.25%
Asset growth of 203.25% while FURY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz checks if modest expansions can create a longer-term lead.
-12.48%
We have a declining book value while FURY shows 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
19103.99%
Debt growth of 19103.99% while FURY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees additional leverage that must yield profitable expansions to be worthwhile.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
173.81%
We expand SG&A while FURY cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.