10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.60M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
53.58%
EBIT growth 50-75% of IAUX's 100.00%. Martin Whitman would suspect suboptimal resource allocation.
53.99%
Positive operating income growth while IAUX is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
2.39%
Net income growth under 50% of IAUX's 26.67%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-244.02%
Negative OCF growth while IAUX is at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-218.85%
Negative FCF growth while IAUX is at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-78.18%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
-78.18%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-78.18%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while IAUX stands at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
78.75%
Positive 10Y CAGR while IAUX is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
78.75%
Positive 5Y CAGR while IAUX is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
78.75%
Positive short-term CAGR while IAUX is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
-26.29%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while IAUX stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-26.29%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while IAUX is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-26.29%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
9.10%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. IAUX's 100.09%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-6.75%
Negative asset growth while IAUX invests at 18.80%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-4.16%
We have a declining book value while IAUX shows 3.40%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-53.99%
We cut SG&A while IAUX invests at 47.05%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.