PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-210.15%
Negative EBIT growth while IAUX is at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-212.00%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-694.18%
Negative net income growth while IAUX stands at 26.67%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-685.71%
Negative EPS growth while IAUX is at 47.64%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-685.71%
Negative diluted EPS growth while IAUX is at 47.64%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.96%
OCF growth under 50% of IAUX's 100.00%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
-30.32%
Negative FCF growth while IAUX is at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-151.71%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-151.71%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-151.71%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
13.47%
Equity/share CAGR of 13.47% while IAUX is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
13.47%
Equity/share CAGR of 13.47% while IAUX is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor advantage that could compound if the firm maintains positive net worth growth.
13.47%
Positive short-term equity growth while IAUX is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
56.89%
AR growth well above IAUX's 100.09%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
-83.60%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
4.82%
Asset growth well under 50% of IAUX's 18.80%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
4.29%
1.25-1.5x IAUX's 3.40%. Bruce Berkowitz sees if the firm's capital management strategies surpass the competitor's approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
212.00%
SG&A growth well above IAUX's 47.05%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.