10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.60M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-21.95%
Negative EBIT growth while IAUX is at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-21.95%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-22.57%
Negative net income growth while IAUX stands at 26.67%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-22.89%
Negative EPS growth while IAUX is at 47.64%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-22.89%
Negative diluted EPS growth while IAUX is at 47.64%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
52.43%
OCF growth at 50-75% of IAUX's 100.00%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags in monetizing sales effectively.
76.02%
FCF growth 75-90% of IAUX's 100.00%. Bill Ackman might push for improved capital allocation or operational changes to match the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-23.22%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
-23.22%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-23.22%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while IAUX stands at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
88.83%
Positive 10Y CAGR while IAUX is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
88.83%
Positive 5Y CAGR while IAUX is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
88.83%
Positive short-term CAGR while IAUX is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
-77.26%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while IAUX stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-77.26%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while IAUX is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-77.26%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-75.36%
Firm’s AR is declining while IAUX shows 100.09%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-619524.61%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
88.59%
Asset growth above 1.5x IAUX's 18.80%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
72.07%
BV/share growth above 1.5x IAUX's 3.40%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
22.15%
SG&A declining or stable vs. IAUX's 47.05%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.