10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.60M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
36.75%
EBIT growth below 50% of IAUX's 100.00%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
36.74%
Positive operating income growth while IAUX is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
8.91%
Net income growth under 50% of IAUX's 26.67%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
8.85%
EPS growth under 50% of IAUX's 47.64%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
8.85%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of IAUX's 47.64%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
0.24%
Share reduction more than 1.5x IAUX's 40.99%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
0.24%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x IAUX's 40.99%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-17.14%
Negative OCF growth while IAUX is at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-31.28%
Negative FCF growth while IAUX is at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-89.52%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while IAUX stands at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
-17.36%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-17.36%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
3.21%
Positive short-term CAGR while IAUX is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
-27.56%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while IAUX stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-27.56%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while IAUX is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-49.70%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
110.19%
AR growth well above IAUX's 100.09%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-7.44%
Negative asset growth while IAUX invests at 18.80%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
1.36%
Under 50% of IAUX's 3.40%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-36.74%
We cut SG&A while IAUX invests at 47.05%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.