10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.60M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-42.30%
Negative EBIT growth while IAUX is at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-42.30%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-44.51%
Negative net income growth while IAUX stands at 26.67%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-44.64%
Negative EPS growth while IAUX is at 47.64%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-44.64%
Negative diluted EPS growth while IAUX is at 47.64%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.12%
Share reduction more than 1.5x IAUX's 40.99%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
0.12%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x IAUX's 40.99%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
64.25%
OCF growth at 50-75% of IAUX's 100.00%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags in monetizing sales effectively.
64.95%
FCF growth 50-75% of IAUX's 100.00%. Martin Whitman would see if structural disadvantages exist in generating free cash.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
67.15%
3Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of IAUX's 100.00%. Martin Whitman would suspect weaker recent execution or product competitiveness.
-85.04%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-85.04%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
26.49%
Positive short-term CAGR while IAUX is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
-31.29%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while IAUX stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-31.29%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while IAUX is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-39.45%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-85.72%
Firm’s AR is declining while IAUX shows 100.09%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-7.84%
Negative asset growth while IAUX invests at 18.80%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-6.96%
We have a declining book value while IAUX shows 3.40%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
42.30%
SG&A growth well above IAUX's 47.05%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.