PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
43.45%
Positive gross profit growth while IAUX is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
-134.00%
Negative EBIT growth while IAUX is at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-164.76%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-132.54%
Negative net income growth while IAUX stands at 26.67%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-129.31%
Negative EPS growth while IAUX is at 47.64%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-133.33%
Negative diluted EPS growth while IAUX is at 47.64%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
34.28%
Share count expansion well above IAUX's 40.99%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
34.28%
Diluted share count expanding well above IAUX's 40.99%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1030.41%
Negative OCF growth while IAUX is at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
18.55%
FCF growth under 50% of IAUX's 100.00%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-99.11%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
-85.27%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-155.93%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while IAUX stands at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
-130.76%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-101.36%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-6514.86%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
41.51%
Equity/share CAGR of 41.51% while IAUX is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
255.92%
Equity/share CAGR of 255.92% while IAUX is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor advantage that could compound if the firm maintains positive net worth growth.
668.36%
Positive short-term equity growth while IAUX is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.60%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. IAUX's 100.09%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
-25.21%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
20.12%
Similar asset growth to IAUX's 18.80%. Walter Schloss finds parallel expansions or investment rates.
-11.65%
We have a declining book value while IAUX shows 3.40%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-27.14%
We cut SG&A while IAUX invests at 47.05%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.