10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
79.20%
Positive gross profit growth while IAUX is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
57.98%
EBIT growth 50-75% of IAUX's 100.00%. Martin Whitman would suspect suboptimal resource allocation.
57.14%
Positive operating income growth while IAUX is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
55.69%
Net income growth above 1.5x IAUX's 26.67%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
56.03%
EPS growth 1.25-1.5x IAUX's 47.64%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if strategic initiatives like cost cutting or better capital management explain the difference.
55.94%
Diluted EPS growth 1.25-1.5x IAUX's 47.64%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if strategic moves (e.g., targeted acquisitions, cost cuts) explain the edge.
0.39%
Share reduction more than 1.5x IAUX's 40.99%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
0.39%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x IAUX's 40.99%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
53.18%
OCF growth at 50-75% of IAUX's 100.00%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags in monetizing sales effectively.
-177.05%
Negative FCF growth while IAUX is at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-109.63%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
-5849.80%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-746.64%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while IAUX stands at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
-1416.20%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-600.04%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-447.13%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
40.96%
Equity/share CAGR of 40.96% while IAUX is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
809.76%
Equity/share CAGR of 809.76% while IAUX is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor advantage that could compound if the firm maintains positive net worth growth.
1934.19%
Positive short-term equity growth while IAUX is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Firm’s AR is declining while IAUX shows 100.09%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.94%
Negative asset growth while IAUX invests at 18.80%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-4.62%
We have a declining book value while IAUX shows 3.40%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
50.78%
We have some new debt while IAUX reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-25.40%
We cut SG&A while IAUX invests at 47.05%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.