10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
20.37%
Positive gross profit growth while IAUX is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
45.76%
EBIT growth below 50% of IAUX's 100.00%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
45.45%
Positive operating income growth while IAUX is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
46.59%
Net income growth above 1.5x IAUX's 26.67%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
45.11%
EPS growth similar to IAUX's 47.64%. Walter Schloss would assume both have parallel share structures and profit trends.
45.11%
Similar diluted EPS growth to IAUX's 47.64%. Walter Schloss might see standard sector or cyclical influences on both firms.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
56.20%
OCF growth at 50-75% of IAUX's 100.00%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags in monetizing sales effectively.
56.14%
FCF growth 50-75% of IAUX's 100.00%. Martin Whitman would see if structural disadvantages exist in generating free cash.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.36%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while IAUX is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
-199.08%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-304.59%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while IAUX stands at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
-1.97%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-260.28%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-191.43%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
31.59%
Equity/share CAGR of 31.59% while IAUX is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
828.10%
Equity/share CAGR of 828.10% while IAUX is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor advantage that could compound if the firm maintains positive net worth growth.
2217.64%
Positive short-term equity growth while IAUX is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.54%
Negative asset growth while IAUX invests at 18.80%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-2.65%
We have a declining book value while IAUX shows 3.40%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
2.50%
We have some new debt while IAUX reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.99%
We cut SG&A while IAUX invests at 47.05%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.