PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-48.57%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-914.93%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-962.74%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-952.63%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-921.05%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.48%
Share reduction more than 1.5x IAUX's 5.10%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
3.48%
Diluted share count expanding well above IAUX's 5.10%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-7172.50%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-2.35%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-186.47%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
-175.14%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
66.44%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while IAUX is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
-485.18%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-562.41%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-10.65%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
116.39%
Equity/share CAGR of 116.39% while IAUX is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
357.67%
Equity/share CAGR of 357.67% while IAUX is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor advantage that could compound if the firm maintains positive net worth growth.
-30.23%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while IAUX is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.85%
Our AR growth while IAUX is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.21%
Positive asset growth while IAUX is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
12.74%
Positive BV/share change while IAUX is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
0.78%
We have some new debt while IAUX reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-13.02%
We cut SG&A while IAUX invests at 58.70%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.