PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.60M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-9.91%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-15.73%
Negative gross profit growth while IAUX is at 1.36%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-23.90%
Negative EBIT growth while IAUX is at 82.20%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-42.51%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-29.19%
Negative net income growth while IAUX stands at 79.48%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-34.96%
Negative EPS growth while IAUX is at 80.22%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-33.82%
Negative diluted EPS growth while IAUX is at 80.22%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
1.93%
Share count expansion well above IAUX's 2.16%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
1.12%
Diluted share count expanding well above IAUX's 2.16%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-115.46%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-132.78%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-20.94%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
34.72%
Positive OCF/share growth while IAUX is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
61.39%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while IAUX is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
367.45%
Positive 10Y CAGR while IAUX is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
232.82%
Positive 5Y CAGR while IAUX is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
173.49%
Positive short-term CAGR while IAUX is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
372.05%
Below 50% of IAUX's 1848.32%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
32.63%
Below 50% of IAUX's 1848.32%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
115.79%
Below 50% of IAUX's 1848.32%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-94.65%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
10.83%
Inventory growth well above IAUX's 16.06%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
-2.56%
Negative asset growth while IAUX invests at 3.14%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
2.43%
Under 50% of IAUX's 5.14%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
-4.31%
We’re deleveraging while IAUX stands at 32.93%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
33.82%
SG&A growth well above IAUX's 33.62%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.