10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.60M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
15.92%
Revenue growth under 50% of IAUX's 148.68%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
16.66%
Positive gross profit growth while IAUX is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
24.32%
Positive EBIT growth while IAUX is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
70.99%
Positive operating income growth while IAUX is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
-3.08%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.95%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
-3.08%
Share reduction while IAUX is at 8.07%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
1.15%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x IAUX's 8.07%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
573.30%
OCF growth above 1.5x IAUX's 28.61%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
341.16%
FCF growth above 1.5x IAUX's 12.32%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1387.63%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while IAUX is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
424.22%
Positive OCF/share growth while IAUX is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
2558.81%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while IAUX is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
748.61%
Positive 10Y CAGR while IAUX is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
246.44%
Positive 5Y CAGR while IAUX is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
506.34%
Positive short-term CAGR while IAUX is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
461.51%
Equity/share CAGR of 461.51% while IAUX is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
22.94%
Equity/share CAGR of 22.94% while IAUX is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor advantage that could compound if the firm maintains positive net worth growth.
96.23%
Equity/share CAGR of 96.23% while IAUX is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if minor gains can snowball into a bigger lead soon.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1524.69%
AR growth well above IAUX's 204.90%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
8.52%
We show growth while IAUX is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
5.47%
Asset growth at 50-75% of IAUX's 9.99%. Martin Whitman questions if the firm is lagging expansions or if the competitor invests more aggressively.
11.98%
1.25-1.5x IAUX's 10.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees if the firm's capital management strategies surpass the competitor's approach.
-4.61%
We’re deleveraging while IAUX stands at 0.72%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.50%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.