PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.60M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
17.43%
Revenue growth under 50% of IAUX's 60.23%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
19.06%
Gross profit growth under 50% of IAUX's 75.44%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
-0.76%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
51.47%
Operating income growth above 1.5x IAUX's 27.13%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
-12.86%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-13.50%
Negative EPS growth while IAUX is at 1.50%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-13.31%
Negative diluted EPS growth while IAUX is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.72%
Share reduction more than 1.5x IAUX's 7.01%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
0.48%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x IAUX's 7.01%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.62%
OCF growth 1.25-1.5x IAUX's 5.81%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if superior pricing or efficient operations explain the gap.
9.04%
FCF growth 75-90% of IAUX's 10.31%. Bill Ackman might push for improved capital allocation or operational changes to match the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8402402.28%
5Y CAGR of 8402402.28% while IAUX is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small improvements can scale into a larger advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1862.77%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while IAUX is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
665.23%
Positive OCF/share growth while IAUX is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
1450.91%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x IAUX's 23.36%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
2319.35%
Positive 10Y CAGR while IAUX is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
325.48%
Positive 5Y CAGR while IAUX is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
265.03%
Positive short-term CAGR while IAUX is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
1766.33%
Equity/share CAGR of 1766.33% while IAUX is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
133.97%
Equity/share CAGR of 133.97% while IAUX is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor advantage that could compound if the firm maintains positive net worth growth.
89.89%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x IAUX's 5.07%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
17.87%
Our AR growth while IAUX is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
0.60%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. IAUX's 17.05%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
4.15%
Positive asset growth while IAUX is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
4.71%
Positive BV/share change while IAUX is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-24.69%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.36%
We expand SG&A while IAUX cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.