PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.60M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-6.59%
Negative revenue growth while IAUX stands at 101.82%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-7.58%
Negative gross profit growth while IAUX is at 111.55%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
1.48%
EBIT growth below 50% of IAUX's 22.04%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
-35.23%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
23.38%
Net income growth 1.25-1.5x IAUX's 18.74%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strategic cost cutting or product mix explains this difference.
24.09%
EPS growth 1.25-1.5x IAUX's 18.78%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if strategic initiatives like cost cutting or better capital management explain the difference.
23.58%
Diluted EPS growth 1.25-1.5x IAUX's 20.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if strategic moves (e.g., targeted acquisitions, cost cuts) explain the edge.
0.43%
Share reduction more than 1.5x IAUX's 14.69%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
-3.86%
Reduced diluted shares while IAUX is at 14.69%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-14.99%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-11.64%
Negative FCF growth while IAUX is at 64.26%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1645.54%
3Y CAGR of 1645.54% while IAUX is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate to a more decisive lead.
2483.86%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while IAUX is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
820.83%
Positive OCF/share growth while IAUX is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
301.84%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while IAUX is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
7066.69%
Positive 10Y CAGR while IAUX is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
378.04%
Positive 5Y CAGR while IAUX is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
500.20%
Positive short-term CAGR while IAUX is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
2935.48%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x IAUX's 1021.54%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
134.69%
Below 50% of IAUX's 1021.54%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
111.82%
Positive short-term equity growth while IAUX is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.55%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. IAUX's 33.76%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
1.33%
We show growth while IAUX is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
-3.29%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
5.10%
Positive BV/share change while IAUX is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-96.43%
We’re deleveraging while IAUX stands at 8.28%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
47.63%
We expand SG&A while IAUX cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.