PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.60M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-144.77%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-144.77%
Negative operating income growth while ITRG is at 246.87%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-124.51%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-124.53%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-124.53%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-166.84%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-166.84%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-101.69%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while ITRG stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
-101.69%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while ITRG is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-101.69%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while ITRG stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
-426.11%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while ITRG is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-426.11%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while ITRG is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-426.11%
Negative 3Y CAGR while ITRG is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
25.40%
Equity/share CAGR of 25.40% while ITRG is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
25.40%
Equity/share CAGR of 25.40% while ITRG is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor advantage that could compound if the firm maintains positive net worth growth.
25.40%
Equity/share CAGR of 25.40% while ITRG is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if minor gains can snowball into a bigger lead soon.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-40.75%
Firm’s AR is declining while ITRG shows 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-7.50%
Negative asset growth while ITRG invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-7.51%
We have a declining book value while ITRG shows 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
144.44%
We expand SG&A while ITRG cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.