PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.60M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
44.20%
EBIT growth below 50% of ITRG's 113.30%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
44.20%
Positive operating income growth while ITRG is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
88.07%
Positive net income growth while ITRG is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
88.24%
Positive EPS growth while ITRG is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
88.24%
Positive diluted EPS growth while ITRG is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
139.30%
OCF growth 1.25-1.5x ITRG's 105.04%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if superior pricing or efficient operations explain the gap.
139.30%
FCF growth 1.25-1.5x ITRG's 105.04%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if capex decisions or cost controls create a cash flow advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
217.84%
OCF/share CAGR of 217.84% while ITRG is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
217.84%
OCF/share CAGR of 217.84% while ITRG is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest momentum can translate into a bigger competitive lead.
217.84%
3Y OCF/share CAGR of 217.84% while ITRG is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see if small gains can expand into a broader advantage.
98.71%
10Y net income/share CAGR of 98.71% while ITRG is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minor gains can compound into a bigger lead over time.
98.71%
Net income/share CAGR of 98.71% while ITRG is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small mid-term gains can develop into a bigger lead.
98.71%
3Y net income/share CAGR of 98.71% while ITRG is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if minor improvements can widen to a bigger advantage.
-74.25%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while ITRG stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-74.25%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while ITRG is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-74.25%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while ITRG is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
67.26%
AR growth of 67.26% while ITRG is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if the firm’s additional AR is warranted by strong revenue or potential risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-12.24%
Negative asset growth while ITRG invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-14.77%
We have a declining book value while ITRG shows 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-44.21%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.