PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-210.15%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-212.00%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-694.18%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-685.71%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-685.71%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.96%
OCF growth under 50% of ITRG's 76.57%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
-30.32%
Negative FCF growth while ITRG is at 46.69%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-151.71%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-151.71%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-151.71%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
13.47%
Equity/share CAGR of 13.47% while ITRG is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
13.47%
Equity/share CAGR of 13.47% while ITRG is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor advantage that could compound if the firm maintains positive net worth growth.
13.47%
Equity/share CAGR of 13.47% while ITRG is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if minor gains can snowball into a bigger lead soon.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
56.89%
Our AR growth while ITRG is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
-83.60%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
4.82%
Asset growth at 50-75% of ITRG's 8.38%. Martin Whitman questions if the firm is lagging expansions or if the competitor invests more aggressively.
4.29%
50-75% of ITRG's 8.22%. Martin Whitman suspects weaker earnings or capital allocation vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
212.00%
SG&A growth well above ITRG's 14.05%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.