10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.60M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-9.92%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-1.52%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-10.21%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-2.62%
Negative EPS growth while ITRG is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-2.62%
Negative diluted EPS growth while ITRG is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
13.35%
Share count expansion well above ITRG's 0.95%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
13.35%
Diluted share count expanding well above ITRG's 0.95%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
16.78%
OCF growth under 50% of ITRG's 92.14%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
-144.35%
Negative FCF growth while ITRG is at 0.38%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-482.18%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-482.18%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-482.18%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
-40.18%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while ITRG stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-40.18%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while ITRG is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-40.18%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while ITRG is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
85.79%
Our AR growth while ITRG is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-17.27%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-28.20%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.56%
SG&A growth well above ITRG's 2.98%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.