10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.60M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
60.35%
Positive EBIT growth while ITRG is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
60.35%
Positive operating income growth while ITRG is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
60.48%
Net income growth under 50% of ITRG's 178.42%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
60.51%
EPS growth under 50% of ITRG's 180.00%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
60.51%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of ITRG's 180.00%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
0.09%
Slight or no buybacks while ITRG is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
0.09%
Slight or no buyback while ITRG is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
34.92%
OCF growth under 50% of ITRG's 8040.24%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
66.17%
FCF growth 50-75% of ITRG's 102.69%. Martin Whitman would see if structural disadvantages exist in generating free cash.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-74.24%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while ITRG stands at 169.74%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
-74.24%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while ITRG is at 169.74%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-74.24%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while ITRG stands at 169.74%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
-344.29%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while ITRG is at 126.96%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-344.29%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while ITRG is 126.96%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-344.29%
Negative 3Y CAGR while ITRG is 126.96%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
-45.15%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while ITRG stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-45.15%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while ITRG is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-45.15%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while ITRG is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
41.21%
AR growth well above ITRG's 12.51%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-6.11%
Negative asset growth while ITRG invests at 14.60%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-2.61%
We have a declining book value while ITRG shows 2.68%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-60.86%
We cut SG&A while ITRG invests at 56.86%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.