10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
58.77%
Positive EBIT growth while ITRG is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
54.67%
Positive operating income growth while ITRG is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
58.77%
Positive net income growth while ITRG is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
59.21%
Positive EPS growth while ITRG is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
59.21%
Positive diluted EPS growth while ITRG is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
54.13%
OCF growth at 50-75% of ITRG's 92.36%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags in monetizing sales effectively.
6.15%
FCF growth under 50% of ITRG's 92.36%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
58.21%
Positive OCF/share growth while ITRG is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
88.21%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x ITRG's 36.33%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
29.53%
Positive 10Y CAGR while ITRG is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
41.88%
Positive 5Y CAGR while ITRG is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
87.90%
Positive short-term CAGR while ITRG is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
-44.76%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while ITRG stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-61.64%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while ITRG is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-7.65%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.37%
Negative asset growth while ITRG invests at 0.12%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-5.86%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-54.67%
We cut SG&A while ITRG invests at 186.44%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.