10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.60M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-230.76%
Negative EBIT growth while ITRG is at 69.21%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-300.75%
Negative operating income growth while ITRG is at 69.21%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-637.65%
Negative net income growth while ITRG stands at 71.22%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-700.00%
Negative EPS growth while ITRG is at 70.27%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-700.00%
Negative diluted EPS growth while ITRG is at 70.27%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
84.41%
OCF growth under 50% of ITRG's 202.68%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
78.99%
FCF growth under 50% of ITRG's 202.68%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
98.43%
10Y OCF/share CAGR in line with ITRG's 100.49%. Walter Schloss would see both as similarly efficient over the decade.
99.10%
Positive OCF/share growth while ITRG is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
97.47%
3Y OCF/share CAGR at 75-90% of ITRG's 111.79%. Bill Ackman would press for improvements in margin or overhead to catch up.
10.73%
Below 50% of ITRG's 89.68%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
79.91%
Positive 5Y CAGR while ITRG is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
55.04%
3Y net income/share CAGR 50-75% of ITRG's 91.12%. Martin Whitman might see a lagging edge in short-term profitability vs. the competitor.
-91.93%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while ITRG stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-85.28%
Both show negative equity/share growth mid-term. Martin Whitman suspects cyclical or structural challenges for each company.
-87.64%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Firm’s AR is declining while ITRG shows 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
100.00%
Inventory growth of 100.00% while ITRG is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
-8.41%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-15.17%
We have a declining book value while ITRG shows 5.36%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
230.75%
SG&A growth well above ITRG's 4.23%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.