PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.60M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.33%
Negative EBIT growth while ITRG is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-0.97%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-1.33%
Negative net income growth while ITRG stands at 2199.56%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.05%
Share reduction more than 1.5x ITRG's 17.41%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
1.05%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x ITRG's 17.88%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.37%
Positive OCF growth while ITRG is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
7.52%
Positive FCF growth while ITRG is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
81.91%
5Y OCF/share CAGR at 75-90% of ITRG's 99.76%. Bill Ackman would push for operational improvements to match competitor’s mid-term gains.
17.97%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of ITRG's 50.39%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
11.93%
Positive 10Y CAGR while ITRG is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
24.95%
Below 50% of ITRG's 100.71%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
-24.98%
Negative 3Y CAGR while ITRG is 309.86%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
-93.56%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while ITRG stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-91.11%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while ITRG is at 47.01%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-88.34%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-11.51%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-14.55%
We have a declining book value while ITRG shows 44.51%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.97%
SG&A declining or stable vs. ITRG's 78.54%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.