PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
42.04%
Positive EBIT growth while ITRG is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
-0.95%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
42.08%
Positive net income growth while ITRG is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
85.19%
Positive EPS growth while ITRG is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
85.19%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x ITRG's 19.44%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
115.79%
Share count expansion well above ITRG's 10.16%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
115.79%
Diluted share count expanding well above ITRG's 63.91%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-29.30%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-84.97%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-40.26%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while ITRG stands at 57.82%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
9.01%
Below 50% of ITRG's 97.39%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
-2134.26%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while ITRG stands at 86.96%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
38.65%
Below 50% of ITRG's 96.03%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
28.63%
Below 50% of ITRG's 99.23%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
-33.27%
Negative 3Y CAGR while ITRG is 94.63%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
65.17%
Equity/share CAGR of 65.17% while ITRG is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
230.13%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while ITRG is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
1346.18%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x ITRG's 94.35%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.48%
Negative asset growth while ITRG invests at 11.67%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-53.50%
We have a declining book value while ITRG shows 96.26%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.87%
SG&A declining or stable vs. ITRG's 132.11%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.