10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.92%
Gross profit growth of 7.92% while ITRG is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal improvements could expand further.
-172.21%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-167.00%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-171.86%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-160.00%
Negative EPS growth while ITRG is at 78.89%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-160.00%
Negative diluted EPS growth while ITRG is at 68.57%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
4.77%
Share reduction more than 1.5x ITRG's 433.93%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
4.77%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x ITRG's 258.33%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
44.75%
Positive OCF growth while ITRG is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
3.49%
Positive FCF growth while ITRG is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-34.39%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while ITRG is at 99.44%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-35.22%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while ITRG stands at 95.89%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
-137.41%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-28.30%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while ITRG is 99.75%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-233.24%
Negative 3Y CAGR while ITRG is 99.20%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
73.11%
Equity/share CAGR of 73.11% while ITRG is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
151.95%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while ITRG is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
976.09%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x ITRG's 112.28%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-8.86%
Firm’s AR is declining while ITRG shows 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-24.70%
Inventory is declining while ITRG stands at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-0.62%
Negative asset growth while ITRG invests at 3651.34%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-5.31%
We have a declining book value while ITRG shows 515.96%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
167.32%
SG&A growth well above ITRG's 1.88%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.