PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.60M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-40.42%
Negative gross profit growth while ITRG is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-18.70%
Negative EBIT growth while ITRG is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-4.01%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-18.77%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-20.83%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-18.75%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
-1.56%
Share reduction while ITRG is at 157.69%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-1.56%
Reduced diluted shares while ITRG is at 157.63%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
74.87%
Positive OCF growth while ITRG is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
-116.54%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
77.47%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while ITRG is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
-206.47%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while ITRG is at 79.99%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-150.22%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
92.12%
Similar net income/share CAGR to ITRG's 96.81%. Walter Schloss would see parallel tailwinds or expansions for both firms.
-377.45%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while ITRG is 73.28%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-1393.97%
Negative 3Y CAGR while ITRG is 21.81%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
-46.37%
Both are negative. Martin Whitman suspects the segment is in decline or saddled with persistent unprofitability or write-downs.
495.46%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x ITRG's 317.31%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
1957.08%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x ITRG's 167.41%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.92%
AR growth of 2.92% while ITRG is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if the firm’s additional AR is warranted by strong revenue or potential risk.
10.99%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. ITRG's 100.00%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
34.49%
Asset growth well under 50% of ITRG's 3622.15%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
36.38%
Under 50% of ITRG's 637.43%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
28.61%
SG&A declining or stable vs. ITRG's 614.11%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.