PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
43.45%
Gross profit growth of 43.45% while ITRG is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal improvements could expand further.
-134.00%
Negative EBIT growth while ITRG is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-164.76%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-132.54%
Negative net income growth while ITRG stands at 70.51%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-129.31%
Negative EPS growth while ITRG is at 74.58%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-133.33%
Negative diluted EPS growth while ITRG is at 76.27%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
34.28%
Share count expansion well above ITRG's 19.35%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
34.28%
Diluted share count expanding well above ITRG's 26.78%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1030.41%
Negative OCF growth while ITRG is at 46.10%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
18.55%
Positive FCF growth while ITRG is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-99.11%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while ITRG stands at 55.84%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
-85.27%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while ITRG is at 75.44%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-155.93%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
-130.76%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while ITRG is at 87.72%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-101.36%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while ITRG is 63.65%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-6514.86%
Negative 3Y CAGR while ITRG is 51.50%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
41.51%
Equity/share CAGR of 41.51% while ITRG is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
255.92%
5Y equity/share CAGR is in line with ITRG's 239.96%. Walter Schloss would see parallel mid-term profitability and retention policies.
668.36%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x ITRG's 153.40%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.60%
AR growth of 7.60% while ITRG is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if the firm’s additional AR is warranted by strong revenue or potential risk.
-25.21%
Inventory is declining while ITRG stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
20.12%
Positive asset growth while ITRG is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
-11.65%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-27.14%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.