10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2315.49%
Negative gross profit growth while ITRG is at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-169.17%
Negative EBIT growth while ITRG is at 75.80%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-164.37%
Negative operating income growth while ITRG is at 38.90%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-162.97%
Negative net income growth while ITRG stands at 58.06%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-89.84%
Negative EPS growth while ITRG is at 64.71%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-89.44%
Negative diluted EPS growth while ITRG is at 64.71%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-0.22%
Share reduction while ITRG is at 22.05%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.22%
Reduced diluted shares while ITRG is at 22.05%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-151.98%
Negative OCF growth while ITRG is at 61.26%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
57.96%
FCF growth similar to ITRG's 62.30%. Walter Schloss would attribute it to parallel capital spending and operational models.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-747.36%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
-2069.53%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while ITRG is at 84.69%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-4739.81%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
-3252.86%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while ITRG is at 99.04%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
39.01%
Below 50% of ITRG's 81.33%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
-1259.31%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
41.94%
Positive growth while ITRG is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
743.11%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x ITRG's 412.67%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
1977.09%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x ITRG's 143.16%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-15.26%
Negative asset growth while ITRG invests at 4.24%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-17.07%
We have a declining book value while ITRG shows 38.78%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
17.91%
Debt growth far above ITRG's 19.90%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
83.02%
SG&A growth well above ITRG's 41.59%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.