PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
79.20%
Gross profit growth of 79.20% while ITRG is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal improvements could expand further.
57.98%
Positive EBIT growth while ITRG is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
57.14%
Positive operating income growth while ITRG is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
55.69%
Positive net income growth while ITRG is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
56.03%
Positive EPS growth while ITRG is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
55.94%
Positive diluted EPS growth while ITRG is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.39%
Share reduction more than 1.5x ITRG's 12.98%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
0.39%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x ITRG's 12.98%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
53.18%
Positive OCF growth while ITRG is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
-177.05%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-109.63%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while ITRG stands at 43.98%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
-5849.80%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while ITRG is at 79.48%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-746.64%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
-1416.20%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-600.04%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while ITRG is 72.21%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-447.13%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
40.96%
Positive growth while ITRG is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
809.76%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x ITRG's 211.04%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
1934.19%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x ITRG's 131.02%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.94%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-4.62%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
50.78%
We have some new debt while ITRG reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-25.40%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.