PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-90.87%
Negative revenue growth while ITRG stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-38.80%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-24.18%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-24.14%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-34.40%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-26.52%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-26.52%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
3.12%
Share reduction more than 1.5x ITRG's 7.03%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
3.12%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x ITRG's 7.03%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-60.31%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-60.27%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
61.44%
10Y OCF/share CAGR at 75-90% of ITRG's 80.56%. Bill Ackman would demand strategic changes to close the gap in long-term cash generation.
-447.25%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while ITRG is at 37.84%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-557.59%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
63.61%
Similar net income/share CAGR to ITRG's 65.62%. Walter Schloss would see parallel tailwinds or expansions for both firms.
-884.26%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while ITRG is 73.91%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-384.82%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
34.53%
Positive growth while ITRG is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
697.67%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x ITRG's 142.31%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
271.44%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x ITRG's 161.13%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
50.46%
AR growth well above ITRG's 90.63%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
40.23%
Inventory growth of 40.23% while ITRG is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
-0.41%
Negative asset growth while ITRG invests at 11.07%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-4.99%
We have a declining book value while ITRG shows 23.40%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
30.13%
We have some new debt while ITRG reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-27.02%
We cut SG&A while ITRG invests at 12.83%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.