PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-100.00%
Negative revenue growth while ITRG stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
73.96%
Positive gross profit growth while ITRG is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
16.17%
Positive EBIT growth while ITRG is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
2.48%
Positive operating income growth while ITRG is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
-0.22%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-0.69%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-0.69%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.60%
Share reduction more than 1.5x ITRG's 22.06%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
0.59%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x ITRG's 22.05%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
33.23%
Positive OCF growth while ITRG is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
33.19%
Positive FCF growth while ITRG is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.46%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while ITRG is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
-458.46%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
27.88%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while ITRG is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
46.25%
Net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of ITRG's 85.42%. Martin Whitman might question if the firm’s product or cost base lags behind.
-2405.60%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while ITRG is 51.92%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
2.22%
Positive short-term CAGR while ITRG is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
54.61%
Positive growth while ITRG is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
1193.41%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x ITRG's 152.98%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
-62.41%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while ITRG is at 213.84%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.73%
Firm’s AR is declining while ITRG shows 51.22%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
100.00%
Inventory growth of 100.00% while ITRG is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
16.36%
Asset growth at 50-75% of ITRG's 30.87%. Martin Whitman questions if the firm is lagging expansions or if the competitor invests more aggressively.
4.78%
Under 50% of ITRG's 50.15%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
151.63%
We have some new debt while ITRG reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
77.89%
SG&A growth well above ITRG's 55.31%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.