10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3737.67%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-129.97%
Negative EBIT growth while ITRG is at 46.86%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-88.37%
Negative operating income growth while ITRG is at 47.80%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-87.61%
Negative net income growth while ITRG stands at 62.35%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-85.67%
Negative EPS growth while ITRG is at 66.67%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-85.67%
Negative diluted EPS growth while ITRG is at 69.44%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.53%
Share reduction more than 1.5x ITRG's 10.23%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
0.54%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x ITRG's 18.39%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.49%
Negative OCF growth while ITRG is at 64.01%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-116.39%
Negative FCF growth while ITRG is at 78.17%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
40.90%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of ITRG's 87.71%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
-332.75%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-140.04%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while ITRG stands at 19.27%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
-3.87%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while ITRG is at 64.39%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-11855.16%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while ITRG is 58.78%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-579.80%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
54.07%
Positive growth while ITRG is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
372.25%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x ITRG's 144.57%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
-47.34%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while ITRG is at 2602.82%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-29.79%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.33%
Negative asset growth while ITRG invests at 7.13%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-13.63%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
-1.58%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-18.67%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.