10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-56.52%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-5.32%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-6.92%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
0.08%
Positive net income growth while ITRG is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.70%
Share reduction more than 1.5x ITRG's 7.75%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
0.70%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x ITRG's 11.34%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
61.34%
Positive OCF growth while ITRG is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
-97.04%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
28.31%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of ITRG's 87.61%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
-460.51%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-292.15%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
-35.33%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while ITRG is at 63.97%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-376.05%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-91.88%
Negative 3Y CAGR while ITRG is 24.83%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
54.61%
Positive growth while ITRG is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
1898.00%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x ITRG's 142.96%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
-34.44%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
19.30%
AR growth of 19.30% while ITRG is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if the firm’s additional AR is warranted by strong revenue or potential risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
28.38%
Positive asset growth while ITRG is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
0.21%
Positive BV/share change while ITRG is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
226.19%
We have some new debt while ITRG reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-98.29%
We cut SG&A while ITRG invests at 56.10%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.