PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.33%
Gross profit growth 1.25-1.5x ITRG's 5.57%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strategic sourcing or brand premium explains outperformance.
-63.34%
Negative EBIT growth while ITRG is at 28.71%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-32.04%
Negative operating income growth while ITRG is at 19.86%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-41.36%
Negative net income growth while ITRG stands at 28.44%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-48.81%
Negative EPS growth while ITRG is at 29.55%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-37.50%
Negative diluted EPS growth while ITRG is at 27.91%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-5.66%
Share reduction while ITRG is at 3.52%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
2.14%
Diluted share count expanding well above ITRG's 0.18%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-93.50%
Negative OCF growth while ITRG is at 17.55%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-45.89%
Negative FCF growth while ITRG is at 16.38%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.57%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while ITRG is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
-331.24%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
4.45%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while ITRG is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
-342.39%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while ITRG is at 34.60%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-550.48%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-66.03%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
136.00%
10Y equity/share CAGR in line with ITRG's 142.91%. Walter Schloss might see both benefiting from stable profitability and moderate payout ratios over the decade.
2137.12%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x ITRG's 133.18%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
-19.25%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-63.24%
Firm’s AR is declining while ITRG shows 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
20.72%
Positive asset growth while ITRG is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
8.82%
Positive BV/share change while ITRG is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
54.31%
We have some new debt while ITRG reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8621.88%
We expand SG&A while ITRG cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.