PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.60M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-6.06%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
91.49%
Positive EBIT growth while ITRG is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
100.00%
Positive operating income growth while ITRG is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
91.68%
Positive net income growth while ITRG is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
92.40%
Positive EPS growth while ITRG is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
91.77%
Positive diluted EPS growth while ITRG is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
9.98%
Share count expansion well above ITRG's 0.26%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
1.58%
Diluted share count expanding well above ITRG's 0.27%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
99.15%
Positive OCF growth while ITRG is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
45.00%
Positive FCF growth while ITRG is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
99.34%
10Y OCF/share CAGR in line with ITRG's 96.28%. Walter Schloss would see both as similarly efficient over the decade.
96.36%
Positive OCF/share growth while ITRG is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
99.25%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while ITRG is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
63.17%
Net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of ITRG's 99.75%. Martin Whitman might question if the firm’s product or cost base lags behind.
50.93%
Positive 5Y CAGR while ITRG is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
86.15%
Positive short-term CAGR while ITRG is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
114.01%
10Y equity/share CAGR in line with ITRG's 124.94%. Walter Schloss might see both benefiting from stable profitability and moderate payout ratios over the decade.
2306.49%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x ITRG's 147.07%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
-38.56%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
94.67%
Our AR growth while ITRG is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
20.06%
Positive asset growth while ITRG is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
-8.08%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
46.92%
Debt growth far above ITRG's 25.51%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-14.94%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.