10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.60M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
20.56%
Revenue growth of 20.56% while ITRG is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a small edge can widen further.
5.78%
Positive gross profit growth while ITRG is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
-33.73%
Negative EBIT growth while ITRG is at 22.05%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
36.02%
Operating income growth above 1.5x ITRG's 17.39%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
-103.18%
Negative net income growth while ITRG stands at 26.23%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-103.43%
Negative EPS growth while ITRG is at 28.00%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-103.51%
Negative diluted EPS growth while ITRG is at 28.00%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-5.60%
Share reduction while ITRG is at 0.50%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-7.69%
Reduced diluted shares while ITRG is at 0.50%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.72%
Negative OCF growth while ITRG is at 17.13%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
34.45%
FCF growth above 1.5x ITRG's 18.34%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
452662.29%
3Y CAGR of 452662.29% while ITRG is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate to a more decisive lead.
1349.50%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x ITRG's 96.62%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
1029.72%
Positive OCF/share growth while ITRG is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
520.34%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x ITRG's 29.69%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
85.45%
Net income/share CAGR at 75-90% of ITRG's 95.53%. Bill Ackman would press for strategic moves to boost long-term earnings.
88.66%
Positive 5Y CAGR while ITRG is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
89.51%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x ITRG's 35.70%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
176.23%
Positive growth while ITRG is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
9.64%
Below 50% of ITRG's 146.64%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
27.12%
Positive short-term equity growth while ITRG is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-37.39%
Firm’s AR is declining while ITRG shows 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
44.93%
Inventory growth of 44.93% while ITRG is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
6.05%
Positive asset growth while ITRG is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
12.45%
Positive BV/share change while ITRG is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-7.95%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.06%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.