10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-8.79%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-8.79%
Negative operating income growth while ODV is at 56.72%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-3.78%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-3.33%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-3.33%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-771.41%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
4.55%
Positive FCF growth while ODV is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
67.35%
Positive OCF/share growth while ODV is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
75.53%
3Y OCF/share CAGR similar to ODV's 75.19%. Walter Schloss might see both benefiting from a rising tide or parallel expansions.
28.76%
Positive 10Y CAGR while ODV is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
71.70%
Positive 5Y CAGR while ODV is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
39.29%
Positive short-term CAGR while ODV is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
-83.91%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while ODV stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-85.82%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while ODV is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-77.79%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
40.98%
Our AR growth while ODV is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
323.22%
We show growth while ODV is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
-4.94%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-4.57%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.79%
SG&A growth well above ODV's 15.83%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.