10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
170.79%
Positive EBIT growth while ODV is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
-120.49%
Negative operating income growth while ODV is at 56.72%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
45.92%
Positive net income growth while ODV is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
46.77%
Positive EPS growth while ODV is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
46.77%
Positive diluted EPS growth while ODV is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
13.36%
Share count expansion well above ODV's 0.18%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
13.36%
Diluted share count expanding well above ODV's 0.18%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
251.77%
Positive OCF growth while ODV is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
185.36%
Positive FCF growth while ODV is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
146.93%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while ODV is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
111.10%
Positive OCF/share growth while ODV is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
-40.49%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while ODV stands at 75.19%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
34.31%
Positive 10Y CAGR while ODV is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
96.30%
Positive 5Y CAGR while ODV is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
56.49%
Positive short-term CAGR while ODV is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
-83.26%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while ODV stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-83.13%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while ODV is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-77.98%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-100.00%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-10.32%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
10.55%
Positive BV/share change while ODV is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-170.79%
We cut SG&A while ODV invests at 15.83%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.