PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-40.42%
Negative gross profit growth while ODV is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-18.70%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-4.01%
Negative operating income growth while ODV is at 56.72%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-18.77%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-20.83%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-18.75%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
-1.56%
Share reduction while ODV is at 0.18%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-1.56%
Reduced diluted shares while ODV is at 0.18%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
74.87%
Positive OCF growth while ODV is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
-116.54%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
77.47%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while ODV is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
-206.47%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-150.22%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while ODV stands at 75.19%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
92.12%
Positive 10Y CAGR while ODV is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
-377.45%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-1393.97%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
-46.37%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while ODV stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
495.46%
Equity/share CAGR of 495.46% while ODV is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor advantage that could compound if the firm maintains positive net worth growth.
1957.08%
Positive short-term equity growth while ODV is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.92%
Our AR growth while ODV is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
10.99%
We show growth while ODV is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
34.49%
Positive asset growth while ODV is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
36.38%
Positive BV/share change while ODV is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
28.61%
SG&A growth well above ODV's 15.83%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.