10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
20.56%
Revenue growth at 50-75% of ODV's 40.32%. Martin Whitman would worry about competitiveness or product relevance.
5.78%
Gross profit growth under 50% of ODV's 1635.00%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
-33.73%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
36.02%
Positive operating income growth while ODV is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
-103.18%
Negative net income growth while ODV stands at 93.28%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-103.43%
Negative EPS growth while ODV is at 98.24%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-103.51%
Negative diluted EPS growth while ODV is at 98.24%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-5.60%
Share reduction while ODV is at 283.31%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-7.69%
Reduced diluted shares while ODV is at 283.31%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.72%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
34.45%
Positive FCF growth while ODV is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
452662.29%
3Y CAGR of 452662.29% while ODV is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate to a more decisive lead.
1349.50%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while ODV is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
1029.72%
Positive OCF/share growth while ODV is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
520.34%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while ODV is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
85.45%
Positive 10Y CAGR while ODV is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
88.66%
Positive 5Y CAGR while ODV is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
89.51%
Positive short-term CAGR while ODV is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
176.23%
Equity/share CAGR of 176.23% while ODV is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
9.64%
Equity/share CAGR of 9.64% while ODV is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor advantage that could compound if the firm maintains positive net worth growth.
27.12%
Equity/share CAGR of 27.12% while ODV is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if minor gains can snowball into a bigger lead soon.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-37.39%
Firm’s AR is declining while ODV shows 104.98%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
44.93%
Inventory growth well above ODV's 5.22%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
6.05%
Asset growth well under 50% of ODV's 13.89%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
12.45%
Positive BV/share change while ODV is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-7.95%
We’re deleveraging while ODV stands at 8.48%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.06%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.