PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.60M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-9.91%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-15.73%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-23.90%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-42.51%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-29.19%
Negative net income growth while ODV stands at 64.04%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-34.96%
Negative EPS growth while ODV is at 65.12%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-33.82%
Negative diluted EPS growth while ODV is at 65.12%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
1.93%
Share count expansion well above ODV's 3.37%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
1.12%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x ODV's 3.37%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-115.46%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-132.78%
Negative FCF growth while ODV is at 13.13%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-20.94%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
34.72%
Positive OCF/share growth while ODV is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
61.39%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while ODV is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
367.45%
Positive 10Y CAGR while ODV is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
232.82%
Positive 5Y CAGR while ODV is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
173.49%
Positive short-term CAGR while ODV is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
372.05%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x ODV's 2.09%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
32.63%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x ODV's 2.09%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
115.79%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x ODV's 2.09%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-94.65%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
10.83%
We show growth while ODV is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
-2.56%
Negative asset growth while ODV invests at 3.16%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
2.43%
Positive BV/share change while ODV is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-4.31%
We’re deleveraging while ODV stands at 15.90%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
33.82%
SG&A growth well above ODV's 4.43%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.