PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.60M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
25.70%
Revenue growth at 50-75% of ODV's 48.95%. Martin Whitman would worry about competitiveness or product relevance.
40.49%
Gross profit growth under 50% of ODV's 95.93%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
65.42%
Positive EBIT growth while ODV is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
51.02%
Positive operating income growth while ODV is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
39.40%
Positive net income growth while ODV is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
38.22%
Positive EPS growth while ODV is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
37.03%
Positive diluted EPS growth while ODV is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.92%
Share count expansion well above ODV's 0.52%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
1.62%
Diluted share count expanding well above ODV's 0.52%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
61.13%
Positive OCF growth while ODV is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
87.44%
Positive FCF growth while ODV is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
638007.73%
5Y CAGR of 638007.73% while ODV is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small improvements can scale into a larger advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2559.64%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while ODV is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
922.41%
Positive OCF/share growth while ODV is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
91608.89%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while ODV is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
1323.86%
Positive 10Y CAGR while ODV is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
439.70%
Positive 5Y CAGR while ODV is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
2117.54%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x ODV's 63.67%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
1870.13%
Equity/share CAGR of 1870.13% while ODV is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
112.28%
Equity/share CAGR of 112.28% while ODV is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor advantage that could compound if the firm maintains positive net worth growth.
104.44%
Positive short-term equity growth while ODV is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-54.70%
Firm’s AR is declining while ODV shows 7.38%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
0.01%
We show growth while ODV is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
6.74%
Positive asset growth while ODV is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
8.12%
Positive BV/share change while ODV is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-10.98%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.87%
We cut SG&A while ODV invests at 6.48%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.