PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
51.64%
Revenue growth of 51.64% while ODV is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a small edge can widen further.
20.77%
Gross profit growth under 50% of ODV's 100.00%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
-180.56%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
72.34%
Positive operating income growth while ODV is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
-367.69%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-368.62%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-381.69%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.22%
Share reduction more than 1.5x ODV's 45.60%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
0.22%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x ODV's 45.60%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
818.43%
OCF growth above 1.5x ODV's 29.50%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
-1121.77%
Negative FCF growth while ODV is at 5.09%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
195.30%
Positive 3Y CAGR while ODV is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
14434.01%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while ODV is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
3412.29%
Positive OCF/share growth while ODV is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
1571.00%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x ODV's 91.80%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
-47476.14%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-297.95%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-409.43%
Negative 3Y CAGR while ODV is 81.47%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
1023.12%
Positive growth while ODV is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
137.82%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while ODV is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
80.89%
Positive short-term equity growth while ODV is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
79.13%
Our AR growth while ODV is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
120.96%
Inventory growth well above ODV's 3.17%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
203.25%
Positive asset growth while ODV is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
-12.48%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
19103.99%
We have some new debt while ODV reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
173.81%
We expand SG&A while ODV cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.