10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-8.79%
Negative EBIT growth while OR is at 18.62%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-8.79%
Negative operating income growth while OR is at 18.62%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-3.78%
Negative net income growth while OR stands at 6687.16%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-3.33%
Negative EPS growth while OR is at 7094.12%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-3.33%
Negative diluted EPS growth while OR is at 7094.12%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-771.41%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
4.55%
Positive FCF growth while OR is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
67.35%
Positive OCF/share growth while OR is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
75.53%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while OR is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
28.76%
Below 50% of OR's 456.64%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
71.70%
Below 50% of OR's 456.64%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
39.29%
Below 50% of OR's 456.64%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
-83.91%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while OR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-85.82%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while OR is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-77.79%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while OR is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
40.98%
AR growth of 40.98% while OR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if the firm’s additional AR is warranted by strong revenue or potential risk.
323.22%
Inventory growth of 323.22% while OR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
-4.94%
Negative asset growth while OR invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-4.57%
We have a declining book value while OR shows 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.79%
SG&A declining or stable vs. OR's 48.71%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.