10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-37.81%
Negative EBIT growth while OR is at 118.15%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-42.49%
Negative operating income growth while OR is at 118.15%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-37.81%
Negative net income growth while OR stands at 12.84%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
22.08%
EPS growth above 1.5x OR's 13.33%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
22.08%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x OR's 13.33%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
75.89%
Share count expansion well above OR's 0.18%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
75.89%
Diluted share count expanding well above OR's 0.18%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-68.24%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-67.89%
Negative FCF growth while OR is at 384.93%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
75.22%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while OR is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
-131.43%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-64.82%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
-33.36%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
11.66%
Positive 5Y CAGR while OR is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
18.90%
Positive short-term CAGR while OR is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
-64.05%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while OR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-52.72%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while OR is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-30.24%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while OR is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
771.84%
Asset growth above 1.5x OR's 3.26%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
492.83%
BV/share growth above 1.5x OR's 3.13%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
42.49%
We expand SG&A while OR cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.